DAVIS v. MASON et al
EVAN DAVIS |
BERNADETTE MASON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
2:2023cv01775 |
May 8, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
JEFFREY L SCHMEHL |
Habeas Corpus: (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number 20010488 (sbt) |
Filing 3 ORDER THAT PETITIONER HAVING SUBMITTED A PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 2254 WITHOUT EITHER PAYING THE FEE OR FILING A MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, A BLANK COPY OF THE APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ALONG WITH THIS ORDER WILL BE MAILED TO PETITIONER. PETITIONER MUST WITHIN 30 DAYS PAY THE REQUIRED $5 FILING FEE OR COMPLETE AND RETURN THE APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WITH PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT. IF PETITIONER FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER, THE PETITION MAY BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE.. SIGNED BY GEORGE V WYLESOL, CLERK OF COURT ON 5/25/23. 5/25/23 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED.(fdc) |
PAPER #2 MAILED TO PRO SE (JL) |
Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES 5/9/23 NOT MAILED TO PRO SE(JL) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by EVAN DAVIS (NO IFP MOTION; NO FEE PAID)(JL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.