Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Davis v. Payne
as 5:2024cv03074
Petitioner:
Matthew Evan Davis, Sr.
Respondent:
Kevin Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DAVIS v. MASON et al
as 2:2023cv01775
Petitioner:
EVAN DAVIS
Respondent:
BERNADETTE MASON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Waffle House, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv03663
Plaintiff:
Evan Davis
Defendant:
Waffle House, Inc. and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Bhandari et al v. National City et al
as 3:2021cv01652
Plaintiff:
Sophia Bhandari, Sierra Wilson and Tony Philip Wilson
Defendant:
National City, National City Police Department, Chief Jose Tellez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00396
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv41956
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EVAN DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Long Island Railroad Company
as 1:2019cv02270
Defendant:
Long Island Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Evan Davis
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Helene Re-Re Williams v. Illinois Department of Human, et al
as 19-1097
Defendant / Appellee:
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RIGHTS and MARY E. EVANS-DAVIS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HELENE RE-RE T. WILLIAMS
Davis v. 8Point3 Energy Partners LP et al
as 5:2018cv02267
Defendant:
8Point3 Energy Partners LP , Charles D. Boynton , Alex Bradley and others
Plaintiff:
Evan Davis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv09494
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
