DEJESUS v. HOLLIBAUGH et al
JOSE JAVIER DEJESUS |
KEN HOLLIBAUGH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF DELAWARE COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA |
2:2023cv03626 |
September 19, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
GERALD J PAPPERT |
SCOTT W REID |
Habeas Corpus: (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 ORDER THAT THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE IS REFERRED TO THE HONORABLE SCOTT W. REID, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO PROVIDE THE DELAWARE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND THE PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL WITH A COPY OF THE PETITION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 9/22/23. 9/22/23 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number APAEDC-16953056.), filed by JOSE DEJESUS. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum habeas petition memo of law, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A to memo of law - trial court opinion, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B to memo of law - post sentence motion, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C to memo of law - en banc opinion, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D to memo of law - order denying review, #6 Civil Cover Sheet civil cover sheet, #7 Designation Form designation form, #8 Case Management Track Form case management track form)(BOOKMAN, MARC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.