Cases 1 - 9 of 9
CARDWELL v. HOLLIBAUGH et al
as 2:2023cv02156
Plaintiff:
JAMAR CARDWELL
Defendant:
KEN HOLLIBAUGH, DEPUTY TAYLOR, DAN CARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
REED v. HOLLIBAUGH et al
as 2:2023cv01900
Petitioner:
ERIK LAMONT REED, JR.
Respondent:
KEN HOLLIBAUGH and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF WESTMORELAND COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBERTS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 3:2023cv00265
Petitioner:
GEORGE ROBERTS, JR.
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, KEN HOLLIBAUGH and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF FAYETTE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DEJESUS v. HOLLIBAUGH et al
as 2:2023cv03626
Petitioner:
JOSE JAVIER DEJESUS
Respondent:
KEN HOLLIBAUGH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF DELAWARE COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RODGERS v. HARRY
as 3:2023cv00196
Petitioner:
JAMES FRANKLIN RODGERS
Respondent:
LAUREL R. HARRY, KEN HOLLIBAUGH and ADA PETER WEEKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. SCI-LAUREL HIGHLANDS et al
as 2:2022cv01141
Plaintiff:
NIARE LAMAR BROWN
Defendant:
SCI-LAUREL HIGHLANDS, LT. YOST, SUPERINTENDENT HEINSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. SCI-LAUREL HIGHLANDS et al
as 2:2022cv03077
Plaintiff:
NIARE LAMAR BROWN
Defendant:
SCI-LAUREL HIGHLANDS, LT. YOST, SUPERINTENDENT HEINSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joshua Robinson v. Palco, et al
as 21-2987
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
PALCO, DIetary Staff, HIXSON, Dietary Staff, BIAN, C.O. and others
JERRY-EL v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2021cv00071
Plaintiff:
BERNARD C. JERRY-EL
Defendant:
MELISSA HAINSWORTH, MS. ANGEL, JOHN WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
