GRANT v. BALDWIN et al
| ROGEL GRANT |
| PASQUALE LEPORACE, MICHAEL ROWE, ARNOLD C. RAPOPORT, JAMES KNOLL GARDNER, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, ED RENDELL, THOMAS CORBETT, CITY OF READING, PA, THOMAS MCMAHON, PATRICT L. MEEHAN, FRANCIS C. BARBIERI, JR., GARARDO VEGA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, THERESA JOHNSON and MARK BALDWIN |
| 5:2011cv03850 |
| June 13, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Allentown Office |
| Outside the State of PA. |
| MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER THAT THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED PURSUANT TO 28 USC, SECTION 1915(e); AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 5/16/13. 5/17/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF.(pr, )
|
|
Filing
2
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE PETITION IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO ITS REASSERTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THIS ORDER; IF PLFF. FILES WITH THE COURT WITHIN TWENTY (20) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER A NOTICE THAT HE WISHES TO PROCEED WIT H THIS ACTION AND THEREBY OBLIGATE HIMSELF TO PAY THE $350 FILING FEE, THIS ACTION WILL BE REINSTATED; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE STATISTICALLY.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 6/15/11. 6/17/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER.(pr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
