KLEIN v. MADISON et al
Plaintiff: CHARLENE KLEIN
Defendant: STEPHEN MADISON, CHRISTOPHER HENDRICKS, MICHAEL GOOD, JACOBY GLENNY, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-X, EDWIN PAWLOWSKI, KEITH MORRIS and CITY OF ALLENTOWN
Case Number: 5:2017cv04507
Filed: October 10, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Allentown Office
County: Lehigh
Presiding Judge: EDWARD G. SMITH
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 126 ORDER OF 4/10/2019 THAT THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 55) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED AS TO THE PLAINTIFF'S a. SECTION 1983 CLAIMS FOR EXCESSIVE FORCE, ILLEGAL SEARCH, FAILURE TO INTERVENE, CIVIL CONSPIRACY, AND DENIAL OF MEDICAL CARE AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS, OFFICER STEPHEN MADISON, OFFICER CHRISTOPHER HENDRICKS, OFFICER MICHAEL GOOD, AND OFFICER JACOB GLENNY (COLLECTIVELY THE "OFFICERS") b. SECTION 1983 DERIVATIVE LIABILITY CLAIMS AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS, (FORMER) CHIEF KEITH MORRIS AND THE CITY OF ALLENTOWN; c. PENNSYLVANIA STATE LAW CLAIMS FOR ASSAULT AND BATTERY, TRESPASS, AND CIVIL CONSPIRACY AGAINST THE OFFICERS; AND d. CLAIM FO R INJUNCTIVE RELIEF UNDER THE PENNSYLVANIA CONSTITUTION AGAINST THE OFFICERS. 2. THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED AS TO THE PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM FOR MONETARY DAMAGES UNDER THE PENNSYLVANIA CONSTITUTION AGAINST THE OFFICERS; AND THE PLAINTIFF'S FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT DUE PROCESS CLAIM BASED ON FABRICATION OF EVIDENCE AGAINST THE OFFICERS IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. ETC. SIGNED BY JUDGE: EDWARD G. SMITH ON 4/10/2019. 4/10/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (DT)
July 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 41 MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER. (SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARILYN HEFFLEY) ON 07/20/2018; 07/20/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES, E-MAILED.(nd)
April 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS SHALL NOT SERVE THE SUBPEONA ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT "A" TO THEIR MARCH 19,2018 LETTER AND SHALL NOT OTHERWISE ATTEMPT TO OBTAIN FOR USE IN THIS ACTION THE RECORDINGS OF COMMNICATIONS BETWEEN THE PLAINTIFF AND HER SON MADE WHILE PLAINTIFF'S SON WAS INCARCERATED PENDING TRIAL; ETC.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARILYN HEFFLEY ON 4/5/18. 4/5/18 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KLEIN v. MADISON et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHARLENE KLEIN
Represented By: ROBERT E. GOLDMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STEPHEN MADISON
Represented By: NICOLE FREILER
Represented By: DAVID J. MACMAIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER HENDRICKS
Represented By: NICOLE FREILER
Represented By: DAVID J. MACMAIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL GOOD
Represented By: NICOLE FREILER
Represented By: DAVID J. MACMAIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JACOBY GLENNY
Represented By: NICOLE FREILER
Represented By: DAVID J. MACMAIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN/JANE DOES 1-X
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EDWIN PAWLOWSKI
Represented By: NICOLE FREILER
Represented By: DAVID J. MACMAIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KEITH MORRIS
Represented By: NICOLE FREILER
Represented By: DAVID J. MACMAIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF ALLENTOWN
Represented By: NICOLE FREILER
Represented By: DAVID J. MACMAIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?