BORZAK v. CITY OF BETHLEHEM et al
| SUZANNE BORZAK |
| CITY OF BETHLEHEM, ALICIA KARNER and DARLENE HELLER |
| 5:2019cv05716 |
| December 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOHN M YOUNGE |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by SUZANNE MCDONOUGH on behalf of CITY OF BETHLEHEM, DARLENE HELLER, ALICIA KARNER with Certificate of Service(MCDONOUGH, SUZANNE) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by DARLENE HELLER. DARLENE HELLER waiver sent on 12/6/2019, answer due 2/4/2020. (MCDONOUGH, SUZANNE) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by ALICIA KARNER. ALICIA KARNER waiver sent on 12/6/2019, answer due 2/4/2020. (MCDONOUGH, SUZANNE) |
| Filing 2 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by CITY OF BETHLEHEM. CITY OF BETHLEHEM waiver sent on 12/6/2019, answer due 2/4/2020. (MCDONOUGH, SUZANNE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CITY OF BETHLEHEM, DARLENE HELLER, ALICIA KARNER ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number APE005388), filed by SUZANNE BORZAK. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheets)(er, ) |
| Summons Issued as to CITY OF BETHLEHEM, DARLENE HELLER, ALICIA KARNER. 3 Originals Forwarded To: Counsel on 12/4/19. (er, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by SUZANNE BORZAK. (er, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
