Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv03336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv05215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MANN v. Manfredo et al
as 5:2021cv03462
Plaintiff:
CHARLES D. MANN
Defendant:
Michael F. Manfredo, CITY OF BETHLEHEM NORTHAMPTON COUNTY POLICE DEPT., MICHAEL J. MANFREDO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAULTZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL. JOSH SHAPIRO ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 5:2019cv05778
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO, OFFICER DAWN HEUSER, BADGE #439, SPECIAL AGENT ERIC J. BARLOW and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREW SAULTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv05716
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Anthony Rivera v. City of Bethlehem, et al
as 19-1392
Defendant:
MARK A. DILUZIO, CITY OF BETHLEHEM, BETHLEHEM POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY RAY RIVERA
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSHUA HOBSON, Individually as well as in their official capacities
MCDERMOTT v. HOST et al
as 5:2018cv04843
Plaintiff:
BROOKE S. MCDERMOTT
Defendant:
OFFICER JOHN DOE, OFFICER DALE HOST, POLICE CHIEF MARK A. DILUZIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv03765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
