Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv03336
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv05215
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00290
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MANN v. Manfredo et al
as 5:2021cv03462
Plaintiff: CHARLES D. MANN
Defendant: Michael F. Manfredo, CITY OF BETHLEHEM NORTHAMPTON COUNTY POLICE DEPT., MICHAEL J. MANFREDO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv05716
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MCDERMOTT v. HOST et al
as 5:2018cv04843
Plaintiff: BROOKE S. MCDERMOTT
Defendant: OFFICER JOHN DOE, OFFICER DALE HOST, POLICE CHIEF MARK A. DILUZIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv03765
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00982
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-2807
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
RIVERA v. CITY OF BETHLEHEM et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv05003
Plaintiff: ANTHONY RAY RIVERA
Defendant: CITY OF BETHLEHEM, CITY OF BETHLEHEM POLICE DEPARTMENT, MARK DILUZIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?