KINNEY v. LOUIS et al
NICHOLAS KINNEY |
ERNESTO LOUIS, JOHN IATAROLA, DWIGHT SCHAFFNER, LEHIGH AND NORTHAMPTON TRANSIT AUTHORITY, CITY OF BETHLEHEM, OFFICER JOHN IATAROLA and OFFICER DWIGHT SCHAFFNER |
5:2022cv00290 |
January 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
JOHN M GALLAGHER |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 RESPONSE in Opposition re #12 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM First MOTION to Strike filed by NICHOLAS KINNEY. (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(GOLDMAN, ROBERT) |
Filing 16 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 MOTION to Strike filed by NICHOLAS KINNEY. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(GOLDMAN, ROBERT) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Hearing that a Rule 16 Conference, in the above case has been set as follows: Lead counsel shall appear for a Rule 16 conference in the above-captioned matter on Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 11:00 AM, at the United States District Court located at 504 West Hamilton Street, Suite 4701, Allentown, Pennsylvania. Counsel are required to meet and confer pursuant to Rule 26(f) and to complete and submit to the Court the Joint Rule 26(f) Report no later than Monday, April 4, 2022. The Parties are advised that the United States Magistrate Judge assigned to this Court is the Honorable Pamela A. Carlos. (mas) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Hearing: An Initial Rule 16 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE SET FOR 4/12/2022 11:00 AM IN Judge's Chambers BEFORE HONORABLE JOHN M. GALLAGHER.(dt) |
Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses, CROSSCLAIM against LEHIGH AND NORTHAMPTON TRANSIT AUTHORITY, ERNESTO LOUIS by CITY OF BETHLEHEM, DWIGHT SCHAFFNER, JOHN IATAROLA.(MACMAIN, DAVID) |
Filing 12 First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , First MOTION to Strike filed by LEHIGH AND NORTHAMPTON TRANSIT AUTHORITY, ERNESTO LOUIS.Affidavit, Brief, Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Brief Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike, #2 Exhibit EXHIBIT A February 25, 2020 Notice of Claim Letter, #3 Exhibit EXHIBIT B February 25, 2020 Letter to LANTA Regarding Video, #4 Exhibit EXHIBIT C May 18, 2020 Letter from Defendant Adjuster Denying Liability and Regarding Review of Video, #5 Exhibit EXHIBIT D October 13, 2020 Letter from Defendant Adjuster Confirming Denial of Liability and Confirming Preservation of Video, #6 Exhibit EXHIBIT E October 28, 2020 Letter from Defendant Adjuster Regarding Procedure for Disclosure of Video, #7 Affidavit EXHIBIT F Affidavit of Jose Ozoa Dated February 9, 2022)(SUMMERS, SEAN) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Strike filed by CITY OF BETHLEHEM, JOHN IATAROLA, DWIGHT SCHAFFNER.Brief, Certificate of Service.(MACMAIN, DAVID) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by TRICIA M. AMBROSE on behalf of CITY OF BETHLEHEM, JOHN IATAROLA, DWIGHT SCHAFFNER with Certificate of Service(AMBROSE, TRICIA) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by DAVID J. MACMAIN on behalf of CITY OF BETHLEHEM, JOHN IATAROLA, DWIGHT SCHAFFNER with Certificate of Service(MACMAIN, DAVID) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by JILL E. NAGY on behalf of LEHIGH AND NORTHAMPTON TRANSIT AUTHORITY, ERNESTO LOUIS (NAGY, JILL) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by SEAN E. SUMMERS on behalf of LEHIGH AND NORTHAMPTON TRANSIT AUTHORITY, ERNESTO LOUIS (SUMMERS, SEAN) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by NICHOLAS KINNEY re: Barry C. Betz served Summons and Complaint upon CITY OF BETHLEHEM by person designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of the named Defendant. CITY OF BETHLEHEM served on 1/26/2022, answer due 2/16/2022. (GOLDMAN, ROBERT) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by NICHOLAS KINNEY re: Barry C. Betz served Summons and Complaint upon LEHIGH AND NORTHAMPTON TRANSIT AUTHORITY by person designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of the named Defendant. LEHIGH AND NORTHAMPTON TRANSIT AUTHORITY served on 1/26/2022, answer due 2/16/2022. (GOLDMAN, ROBERT) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by NICHOLAS KINNEY re: Barry C. Betz served Summons and Complaint upon DWIGHT SCHAFFNER by person designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of the named Defendant. DWIGHT SCHAFFNER served on 1/26/2022, answer due 2/16/2022. (GOLDMAN, ROBERT) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by NICHOLAS KINNEY re: Barry C. Betz served Summons and Complaint upon JOHN IATAROLA by person designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of the named Defendant. JOHN IATAROLA served on 1/26/2022, answer due 2/16/2022. (GOLDMAN, ROBERT) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Returned Executed by NICHOLAS KINNEY re: Barry C. Betz served Summons and Complaint upon ERNESTO LOUIS by person designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of the named Defendant. ERNESTO LOUIS served on 1/26/2022, answer due 2/16/2022. (GOLDMAN, ROBERT) |
Summons Issued as to CITY OF BETHLEHEM, JOHN IATAROLA, LEHIGH AND NORTHAMPTON TRANSIT AUTHORITY, ERNESTO LOUIS, DWIGHT SCHAFFNER. E-MAILED To: COUNSEL on 1/25/22 (bw, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Nicholas Kinney against CITY OF BETHLEHEM, JOHN IATAROLA, LEHIGH AND NORTHAMPTON TRANSIT AUTHORITY, ERNESTO LOUIS, DWIGHT SCHAFFNER ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15678774.), filed by NICHOLAS KINNEY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Form)(GOLDMAN, ROBERT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.