MELESHUCK v. ZAKEN et al
| WILLIAM MELESHUCK |
| MICHAEL ZAKEN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LEHIGH COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 5:2021cv04777 |
| October 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| TIMOTHY J SAVAGE |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DOC. NO. 3 MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER ON 11/16/2021, ALONG WITH 2254 PETITION FORM WITH CIVIL ACTION NUMBER. (md, ) Modified on 11/16/2021 (md, ). |
Filing 3
ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PROVIDE PETITIONER WITH A COPY OF THE COURT'S STANDARD FORM FOR FILING A PETITION PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. & 2254 BEARING THE ABOVE CIVIL ACTION NUMBER. IF PETITIONER WISHES TO PROCEED IN THIS MATTER, HE SHALL COMPLETE, SIGN AND FILE THE FORM WITH THE CLERK OF COURT NO LATER THAN 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 11/15/21. 11/15/21 ENTERED AND NOT MAILED TO PRO SE WITH FORMS.(JL )
|
| DOC. NO. #2 WAS MAILED TO PRO SE ON 11/2/21. (amas, ) |
| Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number PPE233518 (sbt, ) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (JL ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by WILLIAM MELESHUCK. (NO FEE PAID, NO IFP) (Attachments: #1 EXHIBITS)(JL ) Modified on 11/2/2021 (tjd). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
