Quirindongo v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
| Dulcidio Quirindongo |
| Federal Bureau of Prisons and Ricardo Martinez |
| 1:2010cv01742 |
| August 19, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Adams |
| AM |
| Sylvia H. Rambo |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying pltf's Motion for Reconsideration 69 Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 09/27/12 (ma, )
|
|
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: 1) The motion for summary judgment 49 is GRANTED with respect to Defendants Martinez, Holtzapple, Pigos, Rey, Russell, Conlin, Potope, and Donlin.2) Entry of judgment on their behalf is DEFERRED pending further orderof court. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 07/18/12 (ma, )
|
|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: 1) The mtn to dismiss 20 as to Dft BOP is GRANTED.The BOP is terminated as a party in this action.2) The mtn to dismiss 20 as to Dft Warden Martinez is GRANTED without prejudice to Pltf to file an amended complaint asserting claims against him and any other potential dfts, if possible.3) Pltfs amended complaint shall be filed in accordance with the instructions set forth in the accompanying memorandum no later than 7/5/11.4) Failure to timely comply with this order will result in dismissal of thisaction with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 06/16/11 (ma, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
