Cases 1 - 10 of 299
Rivera et al v. Chiquita Canyon, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv06127
Plaintiff:
George Inashvili, Karolina Stachowiak, Felix Ciriaco and others
Defendant:
Chiquita Canyon, LLC, Waste Connections of California, Chiquita Canyon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Gentlemen's Aroma Cigar & Lounge, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01177
Defendant:
Gentlemen's Aroma Cigar & Lounge, LLC doing business as Gentlemen's Aroma Cigar & Lounge, Roberto Gomez, Edwin Sepulveda and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553 Unauthorized reception of signal
Ricardo Martinez-Porte v. Multi-Color Corporation, et al
as 23-3971
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICARDO MARTINEZ-PORTE
Defendant / Appellee:
MULTI-COLOR CORPORATION and W/S PACKAGING GROUP, INC.
MARTINEZ, JR. v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv00542
Plaintiff:
RICARDO MARTINEZ, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Benshoof v. Admon et al
as 2:2023cv01392
Plaintiff:
Kurt A Benshoof and Kurt Benshoof
Defendant:
Moshe Admon, Daniel Auderer, Justin Booker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones v. United States Courthouse et al
as 2:2023cv01167
Plaintiff:
Cortez Daundre Jones
Defendant:
United States Courthouse, John H Chun, Jamal Whitehead and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Martinez-Negrete v. Garland
as 23-1440
Petitioner:
RICARDO MARTINEZ-NEGRETE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Martinez v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00414
Petitioner:
Ricardo Martinez
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
