Kirk v. Wyoming County Correctional Facility et al
| Clarence J Kirk |
| Ameigh, Wyoming County Correctional Facility, Howell, Russell and Penalton |
| 1:2011cv00665 |
| April 11, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Schuylkill |
| AM |
| Sylvia H. Rambo |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
115
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER:1) Defendant Nurse Pendletons motion for summary judgment (Doc. 106 ) isGRANTED.2) Defendant Dr. Russells motion for summary judgment (Doc. 109 ) isGRANTED.3) The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER judgment in favor of Defenda ntsPendleton and Russell and against Plaintiff.4) The motions in limine (Docs. 84 & 91 ) are DEEMED MOOT.5) The pretrial conference and trial scheduled in this case are CANCELED.6) The petition for writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum to produce Plaintifffor trial is CANCELED.7) The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.8) It is certified that any appeal from this order will be deemed frivolous andnot taken in good faith. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 08/20/13 (ma)
|
|
Filing
74
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The motions for summary judgment 41 & 45 areGRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:1) GRANTED as to Dfts for Pltfs claim of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs related to his left ankle injury.2) Dft Nurse Pendletons motion for summary judgment (Doc. 41) is DENIED as to Dft Pendleton for Pltfs claims of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs related to his back and left shoulder injuries.3) Dft Dr. Russells motion for summary judgme nt (Doc. 45) is GRANTED as to Dft Dr. Russell for Pltfs claim of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs related to his back injury.4) Dft Dr. Russells motion for summary judgment (Doc. 45) is DENIED as to Dft Dr. Russell for Pltfs claim of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs related to his left shoulder injury.5) The court will issue a separate scheduling order. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 01/28/13 (ma)
|
|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: 1) Pltfs claim against Wyoming County is DISMISSED. Wyoming County is DISMISSED as a party in this action.2) The USM is directed to serve Pltfs amended complaint 29 on Dfts Dr. Russell and Nurse Pendleton.3) Dfts Dr. Russell and Nurse Pendleton are directed to answer or otherwise respond to the amended complaint on or before 4/6/12.Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 02/06/12. (ma, )
|
|
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The mtns to dismiss 16 & 17 are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:1) The mtn to dismiss filed by Dft Dr. Russell 17 is DENIED.2) The mtn to dismiss 16 as to Dft Wyoming County is GRANTED.3) The mtn to dismiss 16 as to Dft Lieutenant Howell is GRANTED, and Dft Lieutenant Howell is dismissed as a party in this action.4) The mtn to dismiss 16 is GRANTED as to Defendant Warden Ameigh for Pltfs claim of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs .4) The mtn to dismiss 16 is DENIED as to Dft Pendleton for Pltfs claim of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs.5) Pltfs amended complaint shall be filed in accordance with theinstructions set forth in the accompanying memorandum no later than 01/03/12.Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 12/22/11. (ma, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
