Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Agee v. Reno Police Department, et al.
as 26-7363
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER HICKS, BRUNSON, Reno Police Officer, THORNTON and others
Plaintiff:
KEENEN R. AGEE
Walker v. Howell et al
as 3:2026cv01704
Defendant:
THE CAUDEL LAW FIRM, P.A., GWENDOLYN FAY DIPERT and MAXIM BARNABY HOWELL
Plaintiff:
Scott Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Hester v. Oliver et al
as 2:2026cv00118
Defendant:
Unknown John or Jane Doe, Unknown John Doe, Unknown Kim and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wright Hester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins, et al. v. City of Phoenix, et al.
as 26-7265
Defendant:
GABRIEL LOPEZ, SEAN BURTON, BRYAN KORUS and others
Plaintiff:
BRUCE FRANKS, JR. and RYDER COLLINS
Howell v. Heding et al
as 2:2026cv02014
Plaintiff:
Michael D Howell
Defendant:
Nicole Heding and Village of East Troy Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lydia Mason v. Lawrence Hard, et al
as 26-3992
Defendant:
WILLIAM H. HOBART, III, PORTIA H. CLARK, KAREN M. MOORE and others
Plaintiff:
LYDIA MASON
PHILLIPS v. SCHAEFFER et al
as 1:2026cv03747
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY PHILLIPS
Defendant:
DAVID SCHAEFFER, THADDEUS G. WEED, PAUL DE SA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 j(b) Stockholder Suit
Virgil v. Conyers et al
as 5:2026ct03326
Plaintiff:
Christopher Virgil
Defendant:
Counselor Conyers, Acting Warden Howell, Health Administrator Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
IAGOUNOV v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2026cv03746
Respondent:
BERYL A. HOWELL, TODD BLANCHE, U.S. SECRETARY OF STATE and others
Petitioner:
ANTON A. IAGOUNOV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Howell, Jr. v. City of New York et al
as 1:2026cv06804
Plaintiff:
James Howell, Jr.
Defendant:
City of New York, Lieutenant Konstantin Rakhmanov, Lieutenant Ryan McGuinness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
