McCain v. Wetzel et al
John McCain |
John E. Wetzel, Keri Moore, James C. Barnacle, Joseph Nish, Joseph J. Vinansky, Roegner, Nevins, Smith, Brian Coleman, Rhonda House and Crumb |
1:2012cv00789 |
April 27, 2012 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Harrisburg Office |
Fayette |
Sylvia H. Rambo |
J. Andrew Smyser |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 520 ORDER - In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 519 : Pltfs mtn for notes of testimony 506 , for a new trial 510 , for a subpoena 515 , and for recusal 517 are DENIED. This case shall remain CLOSED. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 10/24/19. (ma) |
Filing 408 ORDER: In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 407 ; Pltf has properly exhausted his administrative remedies. A trial date will be forthcoming. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 7/17/18. (ma) |
Filing 364 ORDER: In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 363 ; McCains request for an PI and TRO 349 , mtn for pretrial proceeding relating to a telephoneconference 355 , and mtn for PI and TRO 360 are DENIED. Jury Selection set for 7/24/2017 @ 9:30 AM in Harrisburg - Courtroom 3 before Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo.Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 5/17/17. (ma) |
Filing 339 MEMORANDUM re MOTION for Summary Judgment 289 and the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 335 (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 7/5/16. (ma) |
Filing 328 ORDER: In accord with the Memorandum 327 issued this date: 1) The mtn for exttm 326 is DENIED.2) The r and r 319 is ADOPTED.3) Dft Thomas Roegners mtn for partial summary judgment 259 as to the First Amendment retaliation claim is GRANTED.4) The clerk of court shall not enter judgment of record until all issues in this case have been resolved.5) This matter is remanded back to the MJ Schwab for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 4/19/16. (ma) |
Filing 194 MEMORANDUM re dft's MOTION TO DISMISS 134 and R AND R of MJ Schwab 182 (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 10/06/14. (ma) |
Filing 64 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1) Plaintiffs motion for an extension of time to file objections to the report and recommendation (doc. 54) is granted and Plaintiffs objections (doc. 56) are deemed timely filed . 2) The court adopts the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge (doc. 50). 3) Defendants motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part as to the following claims: access to the courts, due process property claims, and the claims against Defendants Wetzel, Moore, Barnacle, Nish, Vinansky, Smith, Coleman, and House, are dismissed. The motion to dismiss is otherwise denied. 4) Plaintiffs motion and brief to deny the motion to dismiss (docs. 28 & 37) are deemed to be a brief in opposition to the motion to dismiss. The motion to deny is otherwise dismissed. 5) Plaintiffs motion for an extension of time to file an amended complaint (doc. 55) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint no later than January 22, 2013. 6) This matter is remanded to Magistrate Judge Schwab. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 12/19/12. (pw) |
Filing 39 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Denying 36 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by John McCain and 38 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by John McCain without prejudice to re-examining this issue as litigation progresses. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on 9/7/12. (pw, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.