West v. Miller et al
Gerald A. West |
Miller, George, Dees, Nogles, Crawford, Arguette, Brown, Pigos, J. E. Thomas and Hardy |
1:2015cv00858 |
May 4, 2015 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Harrisburg Office |
Union |
CP |
Yvette Kane |
Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Wests motion for reconsideration (Doc. No. 27) is GRANTED.2. Defendants second motion for enlargement of time (Doc. NO. 34) to file a brief in opposition to Wests motion for reconsideration is DENIED as moot.3. Defendants motion to dismiss the complaint and/or for summary judgment (Doc. 12) is GRANTED as set forth below. 4. Wests claim for damages against Defendant Harding with respect to Incident Report 2483187 is DISMISSED pursuant to Heck and Edwards. 5. Summary judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and against West for Wests failure to exhaust administrativeremedies. 34 27 Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 8/24/16. SEE ORDER. (sc) |
Filing 25 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS ORDERED that Dfts Mtn to Dismiss is deemed unopposed and GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case. 12 Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 12/15/15. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (sc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.