Frye v. Wilt et al
Defendant: Nathaniel Wilt, Steven Glunt, Pasquale and John Doe
Petitioner: Devon Frye
Case Number: 1:2016cv00780
Filed: May 5, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Harrisburg Office
County: Centre
Presiding Judge: Martin C. Carlson
Presiding Judge: Christopher C. Conner
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 61 MEMORANDUM OPINION (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re 52 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Pasquale, Nathaniel Wilt, Steven Glunt. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on June 24, 2019. (kjn)
December 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 40 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) For the foregoing reasons, the defendants' motion for summary judgment on the basis of Fryes purported failure to exhaust administrative remedies is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on 12/15/2017. (ktt)
June 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MEMORANDUM & ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Stay (Doc. 30), is GRANTED and further discovery is STAYED pending the resolution of any dispositive motions. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if necessary, the parties will submit a joint proposed revised discovery schedule within 21 days after the resolution of any dispositive motion. 30 Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on 6/28/2017. (sc)
November 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT 10 of Chief Magistrate Judge Carlson, GRANTING defts' MTD 7 to extend it seeks dismissal of Frye's 14th Amendment & "reckless disregard for safety" claim & DENYING in all other respects, & REMANDING matter to Chief Magistrate Judge Carlson for further pretrial management. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 11/22/16. (ki)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Frye v. Wilt et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Devon Frye
Represented By: Martin Stanshine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nathaniel Wilt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steven Glunt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pasquale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?