Priovolos v. Department of Corrections et al
| Ernest Priovolos |
| Department of Corrections, John Wetzel, Mark Garman, Reed, Jessica Welch and K. Witman |
| 1:2016cv01999 |
| September 30, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Bucks |
| GS |
| Sylvia H. Rambo |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER: In accord with the Memorandum 11 filed this date; 1. Priovolos amended complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).12. The Clerk of Court shall close this case.3. Any appeal from this order will be deemed frivolous, without probable cause and not taken in good faith.Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 1/12/17. (ma)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the mtn to proceed IFP is GRANTED. Priovolos' complaint is DISMISSED w/o prejudice with leave to file an amended complaint. If Priovolos fails to file an amdcmplt within 20 days, the Clerk shall CLOSE this case without further order of court. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 12/19/16. (sc)
|
|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry).Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 12/19/16. (sc) Modified on 12/20/2016 (sc).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
