Barlow, et al v. Ebbert et al
| Camden Barlow, Christopher Alvarez, Justin Haynes, Darryl Taylor, Tabarus Holland, Terrell Wilson, Tony C Knott, Agustin Argueta, Douglas Piggee and Nathan A. Railey |
| David J. Ebbert, Buebendorf and Tharp |
| 1:2018cv00716 |
| April 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Union |
| RM |
| Sylvia H. Rambo |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
149
ORDER - In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 148 : 1. The mtn to dismiss and/or mtn for summary judgment 132 is GRANTED;2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter jgmnt in favor of Dfts Ebbert, Buebendorf, Tharp, and Gass and against Pltf Nathan A. Railey;3. Raileys claims against Dft Unnamed Mailroom Officer are DISMISSED; and4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned case. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 9/26/19. (ma)
|
|
Filing
115
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - In order to add some clarity and coherence to this litigation, with respect to Raileys motion for injunctive relief, (Doc. 109 ), motion to amend his complaint, (Doc. 112 ) and motion to supplement his complaint, (Doc. 113 ) IT IS ORDERED that these motions are GRANTED, in part, in that IT IS ORDERED that on or before March 6, 2019, the pltf shall file a single consolidated complaint in this case encompassing all of his claims for injunctive relief and damages. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the pltfs motion for preservation of evidence (Doc. 86 ) is DENIED without prejudice to renewal once the plaintiff files the single comprehensive complaint called for by this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on February 6, 2019. (kjn)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER: In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 89 ; 1. Pltfs mtn for a TRO and PI 2 ), is DENIED;2. Pltf Wilsons mtn pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 201 63 , is DENIED as moot;3. Pltf Raileys mtn for leave to file an amended complaint 65 , is DENIED without prejudice;4. Pltf Raileys mtn for reconsideration 68 , is DENIED;5. Pltf Raileys mtn to sever party from action 81 , is GRANTED as follows:a. The claims of Pltf Nathan Railey will proceed under this matter, No. 18-cv-716;b. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to open the claims of Pltfs Camden Barlow, Christopher Alvarez, Terrell Wilson, Doreteo Garcia, and Juan C. Valles in new, individual actions. The original filing date of Pltfs claims will be preserved; c. The complaint (Do c. No. 1), the respective prisoner authorization forms and administrative orders (Doc. Nos. 10, 20, 22, 34, 37, 43-45, 47, 48), waivers of service forms (Doc. Nos. 40, 55), and copy of this Memorandum and Order will be docketed in each individual Plt fs action;d. Each Pltf shall file an amended complaint within (30) days from the date of this Order. If a Pltf fails to file an amended complaint within the time prescribed herein, the Court will direct Dfts to respond to the remaining FirstAmendment mail interference/enhancement claim as set forth in the original complaint (Doc. No. 1); and6. Dfts mtn to stay the proceedings 83 , is DENIED as moot.Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 10/10/18. (ma)
|
|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM re mtns to proceed IFP 9 , 19 , 21 , 23 , 33 and 36 ; Mtn to proceed as a class action 3 ; Mtn to withdraw 30 . (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 7/24/18. (ma)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
