Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tharp v. Clarinda Correctional Facility
as 4:2026cv00250
Plaintiff:
Davonte Tharp
Defendant:
Clarinda Correctional Facility
Interested Party:
Jeffrey Peterzalek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pete Szmurlo v. John Tharp, Jr., et al
as 26-2216
Plaintiff:
PETE R. SZMURLO
Defendant:
JOHN J. THARP, JR., ALBERTA RONE and DANIELLE M. KAYS
KAY v. CORRECTION CARE SOLUTIONS et al
as 1:2026cv00118
Plaintiff:
GARY LEE KAY
Defendant:
CORRECTION CARE SOLUTIONS, CATHERINE FISHER, ALLEN BUDEK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor-Epps et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv04185
Plaintiff:
June Taylor-Epps, Melissa R. Marhatta, Adam Odeh and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
THARP v. AUGUSTAR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2026cv02927
Plaintiff:
F. SCOTT THARP
Defendant:
AUGUSTAR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and CURRY ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Transfer Act
Smith v. The County Of Comal et al
as 5:2026cv02960
Plaintiff:
Quentin D. Smith
Defendant:
The County Of Comal, Jennifer Tharp, P. Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tharp v. Walgreen Co.
as 4:2026cv00645
Plaintiff:
Erainna Tharp
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Caldwell et al v. Louis et al
as 5:2026cv02527
Plaintiff:
Thomas Paul Caldwell and Joshua Jayme Olivarez
Defendant:
Audrey Gossett Louis, Jennifer Tharp, Sammy Mark Mccrary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
