Williams v. United States of America
| Michael Williams |
| United States of America, Miss Bodge, Mr. Helms, Sykes, Mr. Bradley and Miss Brandt |
| 1:2021cv00436 |
| March 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Martin C Carlson |
| Yvette Kane |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Bodge, Bradley, Brandt, Helms, Sykes, filed by Michael Williams.(ga) |
Filing 11
ORDER adopting #9 Report and Recommendations. ACCORDINGLY, on this 6th day of April 2021, upon independent review of the record and the applicable law, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Court ADOPTS the March 15, 2021 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carlson (Doc. No. 9). See Order for further details. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 4/6/21. (dmn)
|
| Filing 10 Letter to Court from Michael Williams dated 3/22/21 re: amended complaint. (dw) |
|
Filing 9
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint by Michael Williams - IT IS RECOMMENDED that the plaintiff=s complaint should be dismissed, without prejudice to the plaintiff endeavoring to correct the defects cited in this report and bring any other claims the plaintiff believes he may have, provided that the plaintiff acts within 20 days of any dismissal order. Objections to R&R due by 3/29/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on March 15, 2021. (kjn)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Michael Williams. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order to the Superintendent/Warden of the institution wherein Plaintiff is presently confined. For screening purposes only the Complaint is DEEMED filed. Service is deferred pending completion of legally-mandated screening. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on March 15, 2021. (kjn)
|
|
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying #3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Michael Williams. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on March 15, 2021. (kjn)
|
| VERBAL ORDER REASSIGNING CASE - Case reassigned to Honorable Yvette Kane and referred to Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson for the filing of a Report and Recommendation. (jkc) |
| Filing 6 FIFTEEN (15) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER - Within 15 days of the date of this Order, the Warden or other appropriate official of the institution at which Plaintiff is currently incarcerated is directed to provide to the Court, under oath, or declare under penalty of perjury, a statement of the current balance in the Plaintiffs account and a record of the transactions in his account that have occurred with the preceding six (6) months. Order sent to Superintendent and plaintiff. Signed by LP on 03/11/2021. (lp) |
| Filing 5 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED. (Attachments: #1 Instruction Sheet, #2 Fed & Local Rules) (lp) |
| Filing 4 AO 398 and AO 399 Waiver of Service Forms Completed by Plaintiff. (lp) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Michael Williams.(lp) |
| Filing 2 UNCERTIFIED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Williams.(lp) Modified on 3/11/2021 (lp). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States of America lodged pending the disposition of the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Michael Williams.(lp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
