Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,113
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01514
Petitioner: Michael William Davis
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Brown (Bailey)
as 24-1037
Defendant: LORENZO BAILEY, DAVON BROWN, CHRISTIAN WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Williams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01831
Plaintiff: Michael Williams
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Brown (Agoro)
as 24-984
Defendant: OLUWAGBENGA AGORO, DAVON BROWN, CHRISTIAN WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02582
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Brown (Battice)
as 24-884
Defendant: QUINCY BATTICE, DAVON BROWN, CHRISTIAN WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Glasgow v. State of Missouri et al
as 6:2024cv03092
Plaintiff: Shannon M Glasgow
Defendant: State of Missouri, Local Officials, Federal Officials and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Ruegg (Williams)
as 24-786
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: MICHAEL WILLIAMS and RONALD RUEGG
Adragna et al v. Schmidt Baking Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00431
Plaintiff: Salvatore Adragna, Daniel Austin, Bradley Johnson and others
Defendant: Schmidt Baking Company, Inc. and Schmidt Baking Distribution, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
WILLIAMS v. MAHON et al
as 2:2024cv02159
Plaintiff: MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Defendant: RENEE MAHON, JEFF DAVIDSON, JESSICA WROBLEWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?