Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Williams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01831
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Christopher-Michael Williams
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Lt. Ashley Marsh, Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03503
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams and Donna Williams
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Parikh et al
as 1:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Christopher-Michael Williams
Defendant:
Pavan Parikh, All Clerk Staff of the Hamilton County Court and Hamilton County Clerk of Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2023cv01042
Plaintiff:
Christopher-Michael Williams
Defendant:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution, Chaplain Alfred Marcus, Inspector Corby Free and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01760
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Comenity Bank
as 1:2018cv02908
Defendant:
Comenity Bank
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Khamisi et al v. Deters et al
as 1:2018cv00087
Plaintiff:
Kijai Khamisi, Jelani Khamisi, Kimberly Khamisi and others
Defendant:
William Anderson, Joseph Deters, Debra Schinaman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Smith
as 1:2015cv00347
Petitioner:
Michael Williams
Respondent:
Keith Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Smith
as 1:2014cv00468
Petitioner:
Michael Williams
Respondent:
Keith Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
