Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Seppo v. Kijakazi
as 0:2023cv02678
Plaintiff:
Michael William Seppo
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00499
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Michael Houtz v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv07518
Plaintiff:
Michael William Houtz
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wood v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv00331
Plaintiff:
Michael William Wood
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Wood v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
Michael William Wood
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2020cv01081
Interested Party:
SSA
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Michael William Houtz v. Andrew Saul
as 2:2020cv03634
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Michael William Houtz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WILLIAMS v. SAUL
as 3:2019cv02918
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
DARWIN MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dunn v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv05137
Plaintiff:
Michael William Dunn
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Williams v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2019cv00058
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
