Grant v. United States Attorney General et al
| Astley Anthony Grant |
| United States Attorney General, Immigration Customs and Enforcement Agency and Warden of Clinton County Correctional Facility |
| 1:2021cv01942 |
| November 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| MP |
| Sylvia H Rambo |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainees |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Letter from Astley Anthony Grant re: case. (dw) |
| Receipt of payment from ASHLEY GRANT in the amount of $5.00 for WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. Transaction posted on 11/16/2021. Receipt number 333078796 processed by smurphy. (jjs) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (lp) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $5, Receipt Number 3333), filed by Astley Anthony Grant. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Notice of Intent to Reinstate Prior Order, #2 Exhibit B-Document Form frm the Jamaican Government regarding Petitioner's Birth Certificate, #3 Exhibit C-Executive Order 13818 Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption)(lp) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/16/2021: #4 Filing Fee Receipt) (lp). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
