Harris v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
Terry Harris |
United Parcel Service, Inc., Mark Brandt and Corey Schwalm |
1:2023cv00928 |
June 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
William I Arbuckle |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Job Discrimination (Race) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by United Parcel Service, Inc..(Howe, Andrew) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew N. Howe on behalf of United Parcel Service, Inc. (Howe, Andrew) |
Receipt of payment from TERRY HARRIS in the amount of $402.00 for Civil Filing Fee- Non-Prisoner. Transaction posted on 6/7/2023. Receipt number 111100950 processed by AA. (jjs) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Mark Brandt, Corey Schwalm, United Parcel Service, Inc. and provided TO PLAINTIFF VIA U.S. MAIL for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (nr) (Main Document 4 replaced on 6/7/2023) (nr). |
Filing 3 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER. (nr) |
Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number. (nr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.