Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Townsend v. Thomas et al
as 3:2026cv00354
Plaintiff:
Danny Townsend
Defendant:
J. Dewayne Thomas, Tametrice E. Hodges, Henry Clay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Cooke et al v. City of Raleigh et al
as 5:2025cv00253
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Cooke, Charles Farrior, Terry Harris and others
Defendant:
City of Raleigh, Omar I Abdullah and Rishar P. Monroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARROYO v. FRANKLIN et al
as 3:2025cv00071
Plaintiff:
VALERIE ARROYO
Defendant:
FRANKLIN COUNTY, TERRY HARRIS, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Kroger Limited Partnership I
as 2:2025cv02466
Unknown:
Temiika Gipson
Plaintiff:
Terry Harris
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Harris v. Kroger Limited Partnership I
as 2:2025cv02458
Plaintiff:
Terry Harris
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv22515
Plaintiff:
TERRY HARRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harris v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv02273
Plaintiff:
Terry Harris
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc. and Medtronic USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Harris v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00928
Plaintiff:
Terry Harris
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., Mark Brandt and Corey Schwalm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
MICKLES v. ONSTAR GENERAL MOTORS - U.K. et al
as 2:2022cv00496
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MICKLES
Defendant:
ONSTAR GENERAL MOTORS - U.K. and TERRI HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
