Heim v. Dauphin County Prison et al
| Joseph Heim |
| Dauphin County Prison, Dominick L. DeRose, Elizabeth Nichols, Leroy Carroll, Matt Bryan, The Dauphin County Commissioner's Office, Jeffrey T. Haste, Dominic D. DiFrancesco, George P. Hartwick, III, The Dauphin County Solicitor's Office, Frank Lavoy, The Aramark Food Service Comp./Corp., CEO, and/or Pres., Pat Harcleflode and The Primecare Medical, Inc. |
| 3:2010cv01491 |
| July 20, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Adams |
| PT |
| A. Richard Caputo |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
ORDER denying 82 Second Motion for Appointment of Counsel Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 8/4/11 (jam, )
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER denying 48 Plaintiff's Motion for Addendums Addition. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff's Motion for Addendums Addition (Doc. 48) shall be construed as a Motion to file an Amended Complaint. 2. Plaintiff's Motion to file an Amended Complaint (Doc. 48) is denied. 3. Plaintiff is cautioned that his failure to properly serve the defendants with his filings may result in sanctions. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 5/27/11 (jam, )
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER denying 12 Motion for Preliminary Injunction Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 4/12/11 (jam, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
