Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Joseph Heim v. Dauphin County Prison, et al
as 11-3881
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH HEIM
Defendant - Appellee:
DAUPHIN COUNTY PRISON, DOMINICK DEROSE, Warden, ELIZABETH NICHOLS, Deputy Warden and others
Joseph Heim v. Dauphin County Prison, et al
as 11-3721
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH HEIM
Defendant - Appellee:
DAUPHIN COUNTY PRISON STAFF, ARAMARK FOOD SER, CEO and others
Heim v. McVey et al
as 3:2011cv01285
Plaintiff:
Joseph Heim
Defendant:
Catherine McVey, John Wetzell, Shirley Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heim v. Moore et al
as 3:2011cv00270
Plaintiff:
Joseph Heim
Defendant:
Shirley Moore, John Kelly and James McGrady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heim v. Dauphin County Prison et al
as 3:2010cv01656
Plaintiff:
Joseph Heim
Defendant:
Dauphin County Prison, Dominick L. DeRose, Elizabeth Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heims v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2010cv03593
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Paul Joseph Heims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Heim v. Dauphin County Prison et al
as 3:2010cv01491
Plaintiff:
Joseph Heim
Defendant:
Dauphin County Prison, Dominick L. DeRose, Elizabeth Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heim v. The York County Prison et al
as 3:2010cv01369
Plaintiff:
Joseph Heim
Defendant:
The York County Prison, Mary Sabol, Michael Buono and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Joseph Heims v. Mandy Audtrey
as 2:2009cv00356
Petitioner:
Paul Joseph Heims
Respondent:
Mandy Audtrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paul Joseph Heims v. State of California
as 2:2009cv00346
Petitioner:
Paul Joseph Heims
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
