Keys v. Carroll et al
| Carrington Alan Keys |
| Jacqueline M. Carroll, Jeffrey A. Beard, -, Michael D. Klopotoski, Jerome Walsh, Vincent Mooney, Joseph Zakkarauskas, Robert McCoy, Lawrence Publosky, Elmore Angelope and Nancy Fedor |
| 3:2010cv01570 |
| July 28, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Luzerne |
| A. Richard Caputo |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
304
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re 301 MOTION for Entry of Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict (JNOV) and Motion for a New Trial under Rule 59(a) & (e) filed by Carrington Alan Keys.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 12/23/13. (jam)
|
|
Filing
219
ORDER re 218 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Alter or Amend the Court's 9/26/12 Order (Doc. 216) is DENIED. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 12/13/12. (jam)
|
|
Filing
215
ORDER re 214 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1.Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 194) is DENIED;2.Plaintiffs Motion to Stay Consideration of Defendants Motion for Summary Judgme nt (Doc. 192) is DENIED.3.Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 188) is GRANTED as to Defendants Beard, Klopotoski, Walsh, Mooney, Zakarauskas, Elmore, Angelovic, and Fedor.4.Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 188) is DENIED as to Defendants Pudlosky and McCoy. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 9/26/12. (jam, )
|
|
Filing
187
ORDER re 186 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant District Attorney Jacqueline M. Carrolls Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Doc. 133) is GRANTED. Defendant District Attorney Jacqueline M. Carroll is DISMISSED FROM THIS ACTION. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 7/13/12. (jam, )
|
|
Filing
185
ORDER re 184 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry), Motions terminated: 113 MOTION for Leave to File filed by Carrington Alan Keys.IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Carrington Keys' Motion to Supplement is DENIED. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 7/6/12. (jam, )
|
|
Filing
182
ORDER re 181 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Corrections Defendants' Motion for Relief from Discovery Order (Doc. 175) is DENIED. The Corrections Defendants are directed to make reasonable efforts in uncovering the discoverable materials and to document any such efforts. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 6/28/12. (jam, )
|
|
Filing
174
ORDER re 173 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Alter or Amend the February 22, 2012 Order is GRANTED IN PART as follows: (1) Plaintiffs request for all grievances filed against th e Correctional Defendants, the action taken, responses, etc. from the years 2008 through 2010 is GRANTED to the extent those grievances allege retaliation by the Corrections Defendants against inmates who utilized the grievance system or exercised th e right to petition the government for redress of grievances.(2) Plaintiffs request for all grievances filed in the restricted housing unit at SCI-Dallas from years 2009 to the present is DENIED. (3) Plaintiffs request for any and all abuse reports, letters, and complaints filed against the correctional defendants from years 2007 to 2010 is GRANTED to the extent those grievances allege retaliation by the Corrections Defendants against inmates who utilized the grievance system or exercised the right to petition the government for redress of grievances.. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 4/10/12. (jam, )
|
|
Filing
166
ORDER re 165 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry),, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:1.Parties are Directed to submit a Case Management Order within fourteen (14) days of this Order. 2.Parties Motions for Extension of Discovery Deadlines (Doc. 95 and 96) are deemed MOOT. 3.Plaintiffs Motion to Suppress the Use of Depositions by Defendants (Doc. 129) is deemed WITHDRAWN.4.Plaintiffs Motion to Stay Depositions and Compel Legal Materials (Doc. 47) is deemed MOOT. 5.Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Defendants Walsh, Mooney, Klopotoski and Zakarauskas to Answer Plaintiffs Request for Admissions and Interrogatories (Doc. 71) is GRANTED. 6.Plaintiffs Motions to Compel Discovery (Docs. 41, 59, 100 and 127) are GRANTED IN PART. The Corre ctions Defendants are directed to produce materials in a manner consistent with Part I of the accompanying Memorandum. Insofar as these motions seek monetary sanctions, they are DENIED. 7.Plaintiffs Motion for Sanctions against Defendant Fedor for Failure to Disclose (Doc. 138) is GRANTED IN PART. Defendant Fedor is directed to respond to the two interrogatories in a manner consistent with Part II of the accompanying Memorandum. Insofar as this Motion seeks monetary sanctions, it is DENIED. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 2/22/12. (jam, )
|
|
Filing
161
ORDER re 143 MOTION to Strike filed by Carrington Alan Keys Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 2/17/12. Motion is DENIED. (jam, )
|
|
Filing
156
ORDER THAT (1) Deft's 107 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Jacqueline M. Carroll is DENIED. (2) Discovery will be STAYED as to Deft Carroll until resolution of her Motion to Dismiss 133 . Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 2/15/2012. (rm, )
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER granting 2 Motion to Dismiss; denying 8 Motion to Dismiss; adopting in part Report and Recommendations re 21 Report and Recommendations. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the report and recommendation (Doc. 21) will be ADOPTED in part and REJECTE D in part as follows:(1) The recommendation that Defendant Carrolls motion to dismiss (Doc. 2) be granted is ADOPTED.(2) The plaintiff has twenty-one days from the date of this order in which to submit an amended complaint that states a claim upon wh ich relief can be granted against Defendant Carroll on the substantive due process claim. If the plaintiff fails to do so, he has waived the right to amend and Defendant Carroll will be dismissed from the action. (3) The recommendation that the other defendants motion to dismiss (Doc. 8) be granted on the remaining claims is DENIED.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 3/28/11 (jam, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
