Lombardo v. Coslett et al
| Francis Anthony Joseph Lombardo |
| Hussein, Pittston City Police, Pittston City, Frank Coslett, Pittston City Police Chief and Tokar |
| 3:2011cv01895 |
| October 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Luzerne |
| A. Richard Caputo |
| J. Andrew Smyser |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
156
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry).Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 11/26/2014. (rm)
|
|
Filing
113
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) re 87 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Francis Anthony Joseph Lombardo, ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab; (1)the defendants objections to the report and rec ommendation of Judge Schwab, (Doc. No. 110), are OVERRULED;(2)the plaintiffs objections to the report and recommendation of Judge Schwab, (Doc. No. 111), are OVERRULED;(3)the report and recommendation of Judge Schwab, (Doc. No. 109), is ADOPTED IN IT S ENTIRETY;(4)the defendants motion for summary judgment on the plaintiffs Fourth Amendment seizure claim, (Doc. No. 75), is GRANTED; and(5)the instant action is remanded to Judge Schwab for further proceedings with respect to the plaintiffs Fourth Amendment search claim.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 1/29/14. (bs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
