Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Robert Mawson, Sr. v. Samuel DeSimone, et al
as 20-3164
Defendant / Appellee:
CHIEF ROBERT POWERS, OFFICER SAMUEL DESIMONE, Pittston City Police Officer, OFFICER KYLE SHUMOSIC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT WILLIAM MAWSON, SR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mawson v. Desimone et al
as 3:2016cv00400
Plaintiff:
Robert William Mawson, Sr.
Defendant:
Samual Desimone, Pittston City Police Department, Ferandis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marc Keating v. Pittston City, et al
as 14-1840
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARC KEATING
Defendant - Appellee:
PITTSTON CITY, TOKAR, HUSSEIN and others
Francis Lombardo v. Justin Tokar, et al
as 14-1272
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCIS ANTHONY JOSEPH LOMBARDO
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN TOKAR, SGT. WILLIAM CURRY, ALL OF PITTSTON CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Mawson v. Pittston City Police Department et al
as 3:2013cv01714
Plaintiff:
Robert William Mawson, Sr.
Defendant:
Pittston City Police Department , Officer Moyer , Sgt. Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lombardo v. Tokar et al
as 3:2011cv02147
Plaintiff:
Francis Anthony Joseph Lombardo
Defendant:
Justin Tokar, Dion Fernandez, William Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lombardo v. Coslett et al
as 3:2011cv01895
Plaintiff:
Francis Anthony Joseph Lombardo
Defendant:
Frank Coslett, Tokar, Hussein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Keating v. Pittston City, et al
as 11-2092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARC KEATING
Defendant - Appellee:
PITTSTON CITY, TOKAR and HUSSEIN
Keating v. Pittston City et al
as 3:2011cv00411
Plaintiff:
Marc Keating
Defendant:
Pittston City, Tokar and Hussein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
