Mathis v. Dauphin County Prison et al
Plaintiff: Kariem Mathis
Defendant: Hoose, M. Frankenstein, Dauphin County Prison, Dominick L. DeRose, Elizabeth A. Nichols, Leonard K. Carroll, Smith, Weikel and J. Cryder
Case Number: 3:2012cv01317
Filed: July 9, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Scranton Office
County: Dauphin
Presiding Judge: A. Richard Caputo
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:(1)The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 38) is ADOPTED. (2)Defendants Lt. Steve Smith, Officer Josh Weikel, Officer J. Cryder, Officer M. Frankenstein, and Officer Hooses Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 34) is GRANTED.(3)Judgment is ENTERED for Defendants Lt. Steve Smith, Officer Josh Weikel, Officer J. Cryder, Officer M. Frankenstein, and Officer Hoose and against Plaintiff Kariem Mathis on all remaining claims. (4)The Clerk of Court is directed to mark the case as CLOSED.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 8/30/13. (jam)
January 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) The Report & Recommendation (Doc. 27) is ADOPTED. (2) Defendant Sergeant Smith is DISMISSED from this action without prejudice. (3) The matter is RECOMMITTED to Magistrate Judge Blewitt for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 1/28/13. (jam)
September 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 12 Report and Recommendations ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Blewitt; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:(1)The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 5) is ADOPTED in its entirety. (2)Plaintiff s claim for money damages against all Defendants in their official capacities is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.(3)Defendant Dauphin County Prison is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE from this action. (4)Plaintiffs Eighth Amendment failure to protect claim agains t Defendants DeRose, Nichols, and Carroll is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.(5)Plaintiff may PROCEED on his Eighth Amendment failure to protect claim against Defendants Cryder, Hoose, and Weikel.(6)Plaintiff may PROCEED on his Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against Defendants Frankenstein, Lieutenant Smith, and Sergeant Smith.(7) This matter is RECOMMITTED to Magistrate Judge Blewitt.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 9/10/12. (jam, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mathis v. Dauphin County Prison et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hoose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. Frankenstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dauphin County Prison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dominick L. DeRose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Elizabeth A. Nichols
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Leonard K. Carroll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Weikel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Cryder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kariem Mathis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?