Mazzella v. Astrue

Mazzella v. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Frank Mazzella
Defendant:	Michael J. Astrue
Case Number:	3:2012cv01777
Filed:	September 6, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Scranton Office
County:	Adams
Presiding Judge:	GS
Presiding Judge:	James M. Munley
Nature of Suit:	Disability Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1383
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 8, 2014	Filing 23 ORDER DISMISSING CASE; Plaintiffs "Motion for Extension of Time to File Objections" (Doc. 20) is GRANTED nunc pro tunc. Plaintiffs Objections (Doc. 21) are SUSTAINED IN PART. Magistrate Judge Cohn's R&R (Doc. 19) is REJECTED IN PART . The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Frank Mazzella and against the Commissioner of Social Security as set forth in the following paragraph. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Frank Mazzella social secur ity disability insurance benefits is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security to:a. Appropriately evaluate Mazzella's residual functional capacity in light of the medical evidence in the administrative record;b. Elicit additional medical opinion, if necessary, regarding Mazzella's residual functional capacity; and,c. Reach adetermination as to whether Mazzella's vision impairment constitutes asevere impairment or affects his residual functional capacity. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 12/8/2014. (bg)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 8, 2014

Filing 23 ORDER DISMISSING CASE; Plaintiffs "Motion for Extension of Time to File Objections" (Doc. 20) is GRANTED nunc pro tunc. Plaintiffs Objections (Doc. 21) are SUSTAINED IN PART. Magistrate Judge Cohn's R&R (Doc. 19) is REJECTED IN PART . The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Frank Mazzella and against the Commissioner of Social Security as set forth in the following paragraph. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Frank Mazzella social secur ity disability insurance benefits is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security to:a. Appropriately evaluate Mazzella's residual functional capacity in light of the medical evidence in the administrative record;b. Elicit additional medical opinion, if necessary, regarding Mazzella's residual functional capacity; and,c. Reach adetermination as to whether Mazzella's vision impairment constitutes asevere impairment or affects his residual functional capacity. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 12/8/2014. (bg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mazzella v. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frank Mazzella
Represented By:	Thomas D. Sutton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?