Simmons v Ebbert
Petitioner: Roosevelt Simmons
Respondent: David J Ebbert
Case Number: 3:2014cv01422
Filed: July 24, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Scranton Office
County: Wayne
Presiding Judge: Karoline Mehalchick
Presiding Judge: James M. Munley
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry); OVERRULING the objections to the R&R; ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of Magistrate Judge Mehalchick; DENYING petitioner's motion for Summary Judgment 11 ; DISMISSING the petition for writ of habeas corpus; Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 4/18/16. (sm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Simmons v Ebbert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Roosevelt Simmons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: David J Ebbert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?