Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Simmons v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC f/k/a JOHNSON AND JOHNSON PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LLC et al
as 2:2019cv06057
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. f/k/a Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc. f/k/a Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simmons v. Cupp et al
as 2:2018cv03290
Defendant:
Ruth Cupp, John F Martin, Arthur McFarland and others
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Simmons
Simmons v. Maidrana et al
as 3:2016cv01083
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Simmons
Defendant:
C. Maidrana, Jared Rardin and J. Ray Ormond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Simmons v Ebbert
as 3:2014cv01422
Petitioner:
Roosevelt Simmons
Respondent:
David J Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
US v. Roosevelt Simmon
as 14-6877
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROOSEVELT SIMMONS
Simmons v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01334
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Simmons
Defendant:
Biomet Inc, Biomet Orthopedics LLC and Biomet US Reconstruction LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Roosevelt Simmons v. K. Cimock, et al
as 13-13392
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROOSEVELT SIMMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
K. CIMOCK, FNU WILLIAMS and D. B. DREW
Simmons v. Staff at USP-Coleman (2) et al
as 5:2012cv00315
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Simmons
Defendant:
Staff at USP-Coleman (2), K. Cimock, FNU Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Simmons v. Staff at USP-Coleman (2) et al
as 3:2012cv00807
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Simmons
Defendant:
Staff at USP-Coleman (2), K Cimock, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Simmons v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 3:2011cv00895
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Simmons
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
