Njos v. United States Of America et al
Plaintiff: Scott Njos
Defendant: United States Of America and Bureau of Prisons
Case Number: 3:2014cv01960
Filed: October 9, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Scranton Office
County: Union
Presiding Judge: LQ
Presiding Judge: Edwin M. Kosik
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 134 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation 129 , of Magistrate Judge Carlson;2. Defendants motion 101 to dismiss, or in the alternative, for summary judgment, is GRANTED; and 3. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff, and to CLOSE this case. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 7/28/17. (rw)
June 16, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 128 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation 127 of Magistrate Judge Carlson; 2. Plaintiff Scott Njos motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 107), is DENIED; and 3. The above-captioned action is recommitted to Magistrate Judge Carlson for further pretrial management. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 6/16/17. (rw)
April 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 83 ORDER adopting in part the Amended Report and Recommendations 67 and granting 13 Defendants Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff is allowed thirty (30) days from the date of this Order in which to file an Amended Complaint in conformity with the accompanying Memorandum. Signed by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 4/29/2016 (emksec, )
October 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 76 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry). Signed by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 10/13/2015. (emksec, )
September 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER: (1) The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson filed on September 2, 2015 (Doc. 56 ) is ADOPTED; and, (2) The Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. 14 ) is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 9/29/2015. (emksec, )
September 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 69 MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 63 MOTION for Default Judgment filed by Scott Njos. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on September 24, 2015. (kjn)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Njos v. United States Of America et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scott Njos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bureau of Prisons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?