Thomas v. Duvall et al
| Angel Luis Thomas |
| Angela R. Duvall, W.M. Ritchie, Ron Smith, I Ritchie, Gill, Dixon, Wendle, Dunkle, Constance Green and James Eckard |
| 3:2016cv00451 |
| March 14, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Huntingdon |
| Susan E. Schwab |
| Edwin M. Kosik |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
203
CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. (Case closed.) (lg)
|
|
Filing
169
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Thomas' 146 motion in limine seeking to exclude evidence related to the facts underlying his prior conviction is GRANTED; Thomas' 148 motion in lim ine seeking to introduce the deposition testimony of Marianne Sawicki is DENIED as moot; and Thomas' 150 motion in limine seeking to exclude evidence of Defendants' reason for taking certain actions is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 11/10/2021. (jr)
|
|
Filing
139
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 129 Thomas' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is denied. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 4/1/2021. (lg)
|
|
Filing
128
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' 100 motion to disqualify Sawicki as counsel at trial is conditionally GRANTED.Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 11/17/2020. (jr) (Main Document 128 replaced on 11/17/2020) (jr).
|
|
Filing
126
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 116 Thomas' Motion for Reconsideration is denied. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 10/21/2020. (lg)
|
|
Filing
115
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Thomas' 107 motion for sanctions is DENIED. Briefing on Defendants 100 motion to disqualify counsel shall resume in accordance with this Court's 4/17/2020 Order. Brief in Opposition due by 7/21/2020. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 7/7/2020. (jr)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 87 Chief magistrate Judge Schwab's Report and Recommendation is adoplted; 67 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part; a telephonic status conference shall be scheduled. (see order for further/complete details) Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 12/12/19. (lg)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 32 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED IN PART and REJECTED IN PART, consistent with this Order; Additional Defendants' 24 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED; and All Defendants shall Answer Plaintiff's Amended Complaint within 30 days. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 5/2/2018. (See Order for further details.) (jr)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Chief Magistrate Judge Schwab's 13 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in its entirety; Defendants' 5 MOTION to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; Def endant Ray Dunkle is DISMISSED from this action WITH PREJUDICE; Counts I, II, III and VI are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; Plaintiff is, however, granted leave to file an amended complaint within 21 days of this Order; and this case is REMANDED to Chief Magistrate Judge Schwab for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 7/10/2017. (jn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
