Cases 1 - 10 of 9,208
Princess Cruises v. Searle et al
as 2:2024cv06345
Petitioner:
Princess Cruises
Respondent:
La Shaun Dixon-Rushing and Tammy Searle
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2510 Wire Interception
Dixon v. Perkins Jefferson, et al.
as 2:2024cv01376
Defendant:
Teddy Miro, Frank Lopez, Jessica Perkins Jefferson and others
Plaintiff:
Seanah Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Partee v. Stepherson, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02529
Defendant:
LaTanya Owens, James Dixon, Ray Torry and others
Plaintiff:
Laquinta Partee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dixon v. Bailey et al
as 1:2024cv02149
Respondent:
Mr. William Bailey and Mr. Brian Frosh
Petitioner:
Marquis Dionte Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miniard v. Browning et al
as 6:2024cv04132
Defendant:
TNB Financial Services, R O'Neil Rabon, Thomasville Bancshares Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Margaret Miniard
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MONTGOMERY v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00122
Petitioner:
ERIC MONTGOMERY
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WALKER v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00289
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, ROBERT GOULD, BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE ALAN WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HEARNS v. DIXON et al
as 3:2024cv00339
Defendant:
SUSAN GAYE, MICHAEL GZAH and RICKY DIXON
Plaintiff:
JULIUS HEARNS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Dixon et al
as 6:2024cv01342
Defendant:
Michigan State Police, Office of Inspector General, Carey Wilhelm Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Abraham Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIXON v. BROWN et al
as 5:2024cv00243
Defendant:
SERGEANT HARDEN, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DEPUTY WARDEN CHAMBERS and others
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK DOUGLAS DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
