Cases 1 - 10 of 98
Dudley v. Martin et al
as 2:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Lakeisha Y. Dudley
Defendant:
Hon. David S. Martin, Kevin Brewer, Premier Properties, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Canary Date Sculpting, Inc et al v. Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
David Gwaltney, Jay Holt, Linda Lindsey and others
Defendant:
Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Dixon v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
Lenard Chauncy Dixon
Respondent:
Warden, USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dixon v. Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership
as 4:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Susan Dixon
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Warick v. Tussey et al
as 7:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Gary Warick and Gary D. Warick
Defendant:
George Tussey, Gerald Clark, Emmit Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Joyner et al
as 7:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Dijon T. Dixon
Defendant:
Hector Joyner, Gary Rose, E. A. Irwin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Parker v. Dixon-Bullock
as 3:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Montrell Parker
Defendant:
Judge Linda Dixon-Bullock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Dixon v. USA
as 2:2023cv00016
Petitioner:
Lavone Ganithus Dixon, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Dixon v. Joyner
as 7:2022cv00118
Petitioner:
Dijon T. Dixon
Respondent:
Hector Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
