Zavala v. Martinez
Petitioner: Jimmy Zavala
Respondent: Ricardo Martinez
Case Number: 4:2009cv00856
Filed: May 6, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Williamsport Office
County: Union
Presiding Judge: John E. Jones
Presiding Judge: SF
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus 1 is DISMISSED as MOOT.; 2. The motion for summary judgment 8 is DISMISSED as MOOT.; 3. Clrk of Ct directed to CLOSE case. (See memo & order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable John E. Jones, III on 12/09/09. (ki)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zavala v. Martinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jimmy Zavala
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ricardo Martinez
Represented By: Dennis Pfannenschmidt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?