Kula et al v. United States Of America
| Brianna Apfelbaum Kula, Leah Apfelbaum and Jonsidney Apfelbaum |
| United States Of America |
| 4:2017cv02122 |
| November 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Williamsport Office |
| Northumberland |
| Matthew W. Brann |
| Airplane |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Final judgment is entered in favor of the United States and against Plaintiffs as to Plaintiffs' claim for negligence; and 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the case. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 5/18/2021. (jr)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's 70 motion in limine is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiffs' 72 motion in limine is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part without prejudice. Plaintiffs' 74 motion in limine is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiffs' 76 motion in limine is DENIED as moot. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 4/23/2021. (jr)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's 33 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Matthew W. Brann on 5/11/2020. (jr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
