Bell v. Rothrock et al
| T. Montana Bell |
| Hearing Examinder T. Pilosi, D.O.C., C/O Rothrock, Sgt. Roberts, C/O Myers and C/O Womer |
| 4:2018cv02177 |
| November 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Matthew W Brann |
| Joseph F Saporito |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Conditions) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Petition for Removal by D.O.C., Myers, T. Pilosi, Roberts, Rothrock, Womer.(Enerson, Caleb) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion to Extend Time. Defendants shall file their responsive pleading on or before 1/9/19. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 11/26/18 (ms)
|
| Filing 4 First MOTION for Extension of Time to to File a Responsive Pleading by D.O.C., Myers, T. Pilosi, Roberts, Rothrock, Womer.(Enerson, Caleb) |
| Filing 3 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER. Signed on 11/13/18. (ch1) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Conset to Proceed Civil Action) (ch1) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Roberts, Myers, Womer, T. Pilosi, Rothrock, D.O.C. from Centre County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2018cv3812. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 4596370), filed by Roberts, Myers, Womer, T. Pilosi, Rothrock, D.O.C.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Centre County Compl., #3 Notice of Removal)(ch1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
