Ramey v. Lawrie et al
Marquis Ramey |
Thomas Lawrie and Jules Quartapella |
4:2020cv01689 |
September 17, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Williamsport Office |
Martin C Carlson |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
DOCKET ANNOTATION: Case transferred from Pennsylvania Middle has been opened in Eastern District of Pennsylvania as case 2:20-cv-04576, filed 09/17/2020. (jw) |
Filing 4 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1406(a) that this case is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District ofPennsylvania for all further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on September 17, 2020. (kjn) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - For the foregoing reasons, we will order that this case be transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for all further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on September 17, 2020. (kjn) |
Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Pro Se Prisoner Instructions for Filing a Complaint, #2 Excerpts of Local and Federal Rules, #3 AO 398, #4 AO 399) (nr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Thomas Lawrie, Jules Quartapella lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Thomas Lawrie.(nr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.