Cases 1 - 10 of 12
RAMEY v. LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM DAVIS, JR. L.L.C.
as 2:2023cv05089
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS RAMEY
Defendant:
LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM DAVIS, JR. L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marquis Ramey v. Superintendent Benner Township SCI, et al
as 22-1410
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARQUIS RAMEY
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT BENNER TOWNSHIP SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY
Ramey v. Marsh et al
as 4:2021cv01018
Defendant:
Dr. Kollman, Lt. Deloite, Captain Williamson and others
Plaintiff:
Marquis Ramey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMEY v. MERSH et al
as 2:2021cv02140
Petitioner:
MARQUIS RAMEY
Respondent:
ROBERT MERSH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramey v. Marsh et al
as 4:2021cv00797
Petitioner:
Marquis Ramey
Respondent:
Robert Marsh and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramey v. Lawrie et al
as 2:2020cv04576
Plaintiff:
Marquis Ramey
Defendant:
THOMAS LAWRIE and Jules Quartapella
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramey v. Lawrie et al
as 4:2020cv01689
Plaintiff:
Marquis Ramey
Defendant:
Thomas Lawrie and Jules Quartapella
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramey v. Marsh
as 3:2019cv00636
Plaintiff:
Marquis Ramey
Defendant:
Robert Marsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Ramey v. Donna Mellow, et al
as 16-4048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT MARQUIS RAMEY
Defendant - Appellee:
DONNA MELLOW, Asst. Superintendent, DR. RONALD PHILLIPS, Medical Director, N. SMITH, Health Service Administrator and others
Robert Ramey v. John Reilly, Jr., et al
as 16-4049
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT MARQUIS RAMEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN A. REILLY, JR., Superintendent, DONNA MELLOW, Asst. Superintendent, DR. RONALD PHILLIPS, Medical Director and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
