MINCY v. MCCONNELL et al
| HILTON KARRIEM MINCY |
| WILLIAM P. MCCONNELL, K. SUTTER, B. SCHAEF, R. SHOWERS, WILLIAM COLE, NANCY A. GIRIOUX, MICHAEL HARLOW, MARILYN BROOKS, VALERIE KUSIAK, MAXINE OVERTON and LUCAS |
| 1:2009cv00236 |
| September 10, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Erie Office |
| Erie |
| Sean J. McLaughlin |
| Susan Paradise Baxter |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
ORDER denying 111 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 07/05/2012. (kas)
|
|
Filing
106
MEMORANDUM ORDER: AND NOW, to wit, this 25th Day of April, 2012, IT IS ORDERED that this Court's prior Memorandum Order of December 19, 2011 93 shall be, and hereby is, AMENDED insofar as it relates to the dismissal of Plaintiff's retal iation claim premised upon Misconduct Report number 839577. For the reasons stated herein, that portion of the Court's Memorandum Order dismissing Plaintiff's retaliation claim shall be VACATED, and said claim shall be reinstated. In all other respects, this Court's Memorandum Order of December 19, 2011 shall stand as previously entered. Signed by Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 04/25/2012. (kas)
|
|
Filing
93
MEMORANDUM ORDER: AND NOW, this 19th Day of December, 2011; IT IS ORDERED that the Defendants' motion to dismiss 74 shall be, and hereby is, GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: 1. Defendants' motion is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim to the extent said claim is premised upon Defendant McConnell's actions in issuing an allegedly false misconduct against Plaintiff; 2. Defendants' motion is GRANTED insofar as it relates t o Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment due process claims; 3. Defendants' motion is GRANTED insofar as it relates to Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment equal protection claims; 4. Defendants' motion is GRANTED insofar as it relates to P laintiff's claim for compensatory damages; and 5. Defendants' motion is DENIED in all other respects. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 77 shall be, and hereby is, DENIED without prejudice to be reasserted upon a more fully developed record. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on November 22, 2011 92 , is adopted as the opinion of this Court. Signed by Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 12/19/11. (kas)
|
|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM ORDER: AND NOW, this 6th day of August, 2010; IT IS ORDERED THAT Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss the complaint 21 be, and hereby is, GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as follows: 1. Said motion is GRANTED with respect to Def endants Showers, Cole, and Kusiak, inasmuch as Plaintiff has failed to allege their personal involvement in the challenged conduct, and those Defendants shall be terminated from this case; and 2. Said motion is DENIED in all other respects. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter 26 , dated July 15, 2010, is adopted as the opinion of this Court. Signed by Judge Sean J. McLaughlin on 08/06/2010. (kas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
