Cases 1 - 10 of 100
NARANJO v. TRUTT et al
as 1:2026cv02655
Plaintiff:
Isaac Naranjo
Defendant:
C/O Trutt, Officers Lucas and A. Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00993
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pendleton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv01745
Plaintiff:
Lucas Noel Pendleton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lipps v. City of Fargo et al
as 3:2026cv00294
Plaintiff:
Angela Robin Lipps
Defendant:
City of Fargo and Lucas Heck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Horton v. Sogno Tours LLC
as 6:2026cv02063
Plaintiff:
Lucas B. Horton
Defendant:
Sogno Tours LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
LUCAS v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 2:2026cv11969
Plaintiff:
ARMOND LUCAS
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Ashley et al v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al
as 0:2026cv03982
Plaintiff:
Joy Ashley, Clover Crest Farms, Inc., Mark Foster and others
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc., Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc., JBS, S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 181 Packers & Stockyard Act
Lucas v. Federal Express Corp.
as 2:2026cv03163
Plaintiff:
Jamee Lucas
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05613
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Antonucci v. Lucas et al
as 8:2026cv02572
Plaintiff:
Sergio Antonucci
Defendant:
Michael T. Lucas, James D. Henderson Jr. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
