MARSHALL v. SOBINA et al
| JAMES MARSHALL |
| RAYMOND J. SOBINA, MAXINE OVERTON, WILLIAM MCCONNELL, ROBERTSON, HEWITT, DANIEL S. TELEGA, TAMMY MOWRY, RALPH LUCUS, MARK BAKER, V. GILREALTH and SCOTT BRECKENRIDGE |
| 1:2010cv00169 |
| July 13, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Erie Office |
| Erie |
| Susan Paradise Baxter |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
181
ORDER LIFTING ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSURE. The administrative closure in this case is LIFTED and a status conference on this matter shall be held on Tuesday, February 11, 2016 at 11:00 A.M. in the chambers of the Honorable Maurice B. Cohill, Jr., Suite 8170 U.S. Courthouse, Pittsburgh, PA 15219. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 1/21/16. (bfm)
|
|
Filing
174
ORDER ENTERED directing that pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(1) and the court order of 3/24/1999 at Misc. 99-95, the Clerk of Court is directed to request a lawyer to consider entering an appearance on behalf of the plaintiff. Further ordered that the Cle rk of Court is directed to provide counsel with a copy of the complaint, any amended complaint, all answers and pretrial narrative statements should any exist and shall provide counsel with any additional pleadings or documents as requested by counsel. Further ordered that this case will be administratively closed pending the completion of the search for counsel and all deadlines will be held in abeyance. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 8/25/15. (bfm)
|
|
Filing
165
AMENDED FINAL SCHEDULING ORDER. Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/5/2015 is cancelled and rescheduled for 10/26/2015 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom A, U.S. Courthouse, Erie, Pennsylvania before Judge Maurice B. Cohill. Jury trial scheduled for 10/5/2015 is cancelled and rescheduled for 10/26/2015 immiedately following the final pretrial conference. Only deadlines are as set forth in the Order. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 8/7/15. (bfm)
|
|
Filing
152
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 112 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 116 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendation 134 , as supplemented in Memoran dum Opinion, as Court's Opinion on 112 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; and adopting Report and Recommendation 134 as Court's Opinion on 116 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants Dr. Mark Baker, Dr. Valerie Gilreath, and Ralph Lucas shall be dismissed as parties to this action. A status conference with respect to this matter will be held on April 16, 2015 at 11:00 A.M. in Judge Cohills chambers, 8170 U.S Courthouse, 700 Grant Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15219. Plaintiff shall participate in the status conference by telephone; defense counsel shall make the necessary arrangements for ensuring Plaintiffs participation in the status conference. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 3/31/15. (bfm )
|
|
Filing
150
OPINION and ORDER denying 128 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 3/19/15. (bfm ) Modified on 3/19/2015. (bfm, )
|
|
Filing
144
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying Plaintiff's appeal of Magistrate Judge Baxter's June 2, 2014 Memorandum Order 135 . Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 9/9/14. (bfm )
|
|
Filing
143
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 136 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by JAMES MARSHALL. After de novo review of Plaintiff's Motion for Injunctive Relief and the other documents in this case, together with the July 7, 2014 Report and Recommendat ion of Magistrate Judge Baxter, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 142 , dated July 7, 2014, is adopted as the Opinion of the Court and that the Plaintiff's Motion for Injunctive Relief 136 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 09/09/2014. (bfm )
|
|
Filing
110
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 105 Report and Recommendation: Ordered that this matter is remanded back to M.J. baxter for further review of this matter consistent with Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 9/23/13. (bfm )
|
|
Filing
103
MEMORANDUM ORDER DENYING 94 Objections filed by JAMES MARSHALL which Court considered an appeal of M.J. Baxter's 2/11/13 Text Order denying Plaintiff's "Motion for Appointment of Independent Expert Witness" 80 . Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 4/23/13. (bfm)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER denying 81 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; adopting as Opinion of the Court the Report and Recommendation 93 of Magistrate Judge Susan Paradse Baxter dated 2/13/13. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 3/18/13. (kld)
|
|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM ORDER that the 53 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Baxter dated 9/16/2011 is adopted as the Opinion of the Court. The 24 Motion to Dismiss filed by the Commonwealth Defendants is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. In paricula r, it is GRANTED as to all claims against Defendants Robertson and Overton and as to the deliberate indifference claims against Defendant Sobina. It is DENIED as to the claims against Defendants Lucas, McConnell and Breckenridge and as to the retali ation claims against Defendant Sobina. The Clerk of Courts is DIRECTED to terminate Defendants Robertson and Overton from this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the 32 Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Baker, Telga, Gilreath, and Mowery is DENIED. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 10/4/2011. (sjs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
