Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Nigel Parms v. Raymond Sobina, et al
as 19-3873
Defendant / Appellee:
RAYMOND J. SOBINA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NIGEL DWAYNE PARMS
Antonio Pearson v. Prison Health Service, et al
as 16-1140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO PEARSON
Defendant - Appellee:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, SOMERSET HOSPITAL, MEDICAL DIRECTOR MCGRATH and others
WATSON v. SOBINA et al
as 2:2013cv07422
Petitioner:
DWIGHT WATSON
Respondent:
RAYMOND J. SOBINA, LYNN ABRAHAM and MIKE FISHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: Hector Huerta
as 12-3849
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: HECTOR HUERTAS
Defendant - Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD, RICHARD HALL, NANCY A. GIROUX and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
SEAN J MCLAUGHLIN, Honorable
Jermaine Scott v. Raymond Sobina, et al
as 12-1036
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERMAINE ALONZO SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND J. SOBINA, DA PHILADELPHIA and ATTY GEN PA
Michael Pendleton v. Raymond Sobina, et al
as 11-4000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND J. SOBINA, DA ALLEGHENY COUNTY and ATTY GEN PA
Frederick Torrence v. Raymond Sobina, et al
as 11-3737
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK M. TORRENCE
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND J. SOBINA, PA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, SHELLY LEE THOMPSON and others
Hector Huertas v. Raymond Sobina, et al
as 11-3529
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HECTOR HUERTAS
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND J. SOBINA, SUPERINTENDENT and DAN HENRY, MAILROOM SUPERVISOR
Debtor - Appellee:
DORINA VARNER, CHIEF SECRETARY OF INMATE GRIEVANCES
Nigel Parms v. Raymond Sobina, et al
as 10-4786
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NIGEL D. PARMS
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND J. SOBINA, ATTY GEN PA and DA ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Mitchell v. Sobina et al
as 3:2010cv02267
Petitioner:
Christopher Columbus Mitchell
Respondent:
Raymond J. Sobina and Thomas Corbett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
